FOR WHAT
IT’S WORTH
“The People Have Spoken!!!” |
Issue
72 |
|
By: Ron Brounes |
December 2004 |
(Well, at least, the more decisive ones did.) Over the past 18 months or so, we had the
extreme pleasure of getting to know our exceptional candidates; their hopes and
dreams for the future; their specific visions and policies for the one
remaining Superpower. We marveled over
their impressive experiences and many successes that helped qualify them to
assume the role of the most powerful person in the world. We learned of their causes and passions from
following the money trail of their supporters’ contributions. We recognized the wonderful power and
privilege of Free Speech as independent groups like “Swift Boat Veterans” and
“Moveon.org” shared their patriotic perspectives through those truthful
advertisements. We gained knowledge as
the objective, impartial media at CNN, Fox, CBS (and Al Jezeera) helped
decipher this dialogue for those less informed.
We marveled over the outstanding example our country set, knowing that
future thriving democracies in Iraq, Iran, and the Palestinian Authority watched
with hope and admiration. We observed
with pride as the world remained supportive (and envious) of all that is
positive, strong, and moral about the United States.
We met their wonderful families (at least, the
heterosexual members) and those loyal and trusted advisers who openly shared unbiased
insight with the public. We came to
realize that men of honor often maintain diverse opinions about solving the
world’s challenges, yet always express their views with such integrity,
diplomacy, and an eloquent command of the English (and occasionally Spanish)
language (s). Yes, during this campaign
season, we witnessed an informative civics lesson unfold before our eyes as
honest debate and an intellectual flow of ideas graced the daily news. A presidential campaign truly represents
democracy at its finest.
SO JUST WHAT DID WE
LEARN???
On one hand, the Democratic champion of the
impoverished, downtrodden, and jobless is actually a wealthy, East Coast,
aristocratic elitist with a penchant for marrying well. This decorated war hero who proclaims that
he’s “reporting for duty” to imply a strong military record is really an
anti-war monger who is loathed by his fellow veterans. While claims of his heroic actions remain in
dispute, no one questions the life saving bravery exhibited when giving
mouth-to-mouth to his pet hamster. This
“flip-flopping” opportunist apparently accomplished nothing during his long
career in politics and is considered the most liberal Senator (even more
liberal than his near-socialist counterpart from Massachusetts). While he has been training for debates his
entire life, his snooty wife dismisses the public arena and cusses like a
sailor when confronted by media. In his
free time, this candidate (who resembles a Frenchman) enjoys the sport of the
common man he represents (windsurfing).
His choice of running mate, the son of a mill worker, arose from the
depths of poverty to become a successful ambulance chaser.
On the other hand, the Republican war president
prepared for military conflict by serving admirably during Vietnam with the
National Guard in Alabama (at least, when he wasn’t AWOL). A self-proclaimed wild-man during his youth,
he found strength in religion which helps him to reach each decision he faces
today. A compassionate conservative, he
will never give Europe veto power over America’s future and considers Poland
among our most trusted and substantial allies.
He understands that being president is “hard work” and clears his head
while clearing some brush at his Crawford Ranch. An underdog at debating, he remains a
decisive man of action rather than of words and still has some difficulty
pronouncing “nukular.” Confident in his
decisions, he has made nary a mistake during the four years in office which saw
a ballooning budget deficit and apparently “the wrong war at the wrong
time.” A staunch supporter of the
pro-life movement and pro-family values, he wholeheartedly stands by his
foul-mouthed vice president who, by the way, has a lesbian daughter.
JUST WHO WERE THESE
“UNDECIDED?”
As election day approached, a significant percentage
of voters remained “undecided.”
Obviously, the difficult choice between these two “outstanding” leaders
and men of vision created great stress and uncertainty. Some turned to role models like P-Diddy, The
Boss, Michael Moore, Governor Arnold,
Nolan Ryan, and Mel Gibson for sage political advice. Others checked out the daily projections from
the pollsters to see how those individuals they most resemble will be voting. Still others drove the neighborhoods checking
out yard signs in front of friends’ and family members’ homes (and vacant lots)
to determine where loyalties lie.
Mainly they struggled with the incongruity of the
candidates and their campaigns. Some
disliked the current state of the country, but simply never connected with the
alternative to the incumbent. Others
strongly opposed the war, but feared that a change from the current leadership
would bring disastrous results. Some
were content with the challenger, but couldn’t bear the thought of a trial
lawyer just a heartbeat away from the presidency. Others wished the choices of Democratic Vice
President and President were “flip-flopped” on the ticket. Some respected the business and foreign
affairs positions of the current administration, but disagreed on certain
social issues. Others suffered through
the challenging economic times with no jobs or prospects, but found solace in
the moral backbone and faith of the President.
In all seriousness, many voters seemed to share the
same exact sentiment, while they struggled with the choice between two “less
than desirable” candidates. This
simply cannot be the best we can do. While
these are seemingly honorable men with a patriotic desire to serve their
country, there must be better options out there somewhere. Where are the successful leaders who have
earned sound, ethical reputations for intelligence and success? Where are those hard working,
independent-minded folks who are not beholden to any party or partisan issues
groups? Maybe Ross Perot was a bit of a
“kook,” but aren’t there others with similar ideals and desires to lead (and
just enough ego to run)? Politics has
become such a mean-spirited, dirty game that often the best and the brightest
choose to avoid it altogether.
Therefore, many of us remain “undecided,” frustrated by the process,
embarrassed by the negativity that the season brings, tuning out the pundits
and media who shed virtually no real insight (except Jon Stewart), and wishing
for better candidates (and better times ahead).
In the meantime, the people have spoken; a president
has been elected and it’s time to put aside all differences, accusations,
bickering, and mean-spirited parting comments (though honest debate is still
allowed and encouraged). It’s time to
support the elected leader of the free world, whether or not he was your
choice. God Bless the President and the
United States of America. (In this day and age, we can use all the blessings we
can get.)
Please
remember Brounes & Associates for:
q
Investors Relations
q
Financial Writing/PR
q
Speeches
q
Articles/Newsletters
q
Strategic Planning
q
Business/Marketing
Plans
q
Analytical Presentations
q
Presentation Training
q
Corporate Education/Training
q
Government Affairs
FOR WHAT IT’S WORTH is a publication of
Brounes & Associates focusing on marketing, communications consulting, and
strategic planning. Please call Ron Brounes at
713-432-1332 for additional information. I sincerely hope I did not insult
anyone for their political views. Any negative sentiment was supposed to be
directed more at the process than the parties or candidates themselves. If you object to anything that was stated or
implied, please realize that Ron Brounes did NOT approve this message. Also, if you would prefer an emailed version
of these newsletters in the future, please let me know and send me your
email address.